Stephen A. Smith has sharply criticized Karmelo Anthony’s self-defense claim after a Texas jury convicted Anthony of murder and sentenced him to 35 years in prison for killing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf.
Anthony, 19, was sentenced June 9 in Collin County, Texas, for the fatal stabbing at a Frisco ISD track meet on April 2, 2025. The case has drawn national scrutiny because of the school setting, the teenagers involved, and disputes over race, self-defense, and jury selection.
Smith rejects the self-defense argument.

Smith addressed the case on his “Straight Shooter” podcast after Anthony’s conviction and sentence. He said Anthony “murdered Austin Metcalf” and rejected the idea that the stabbing could be excused as self-defense.
The ESPN commentator focused on the central question jurors had to decide: whether Anthony’s use of a knife was legally justified during the confrontation. A jury rejected the self-defense claim and found Anthony guilty of murder.
Smith also said the killing should concern any parent who sends a child to school activities. His comments moved the case back into public discussion days after the verdict.
Fatal stabbing followed a tent dispute.
The stabbing happened at Kuykendall Stadium in Frisco during a district track meet involving students from multiple schools. Anthony and Metcalf were both 17 at the time and attended different schools.
Witnesses said the confrontation began after Anthony sat under a tent used by Metcalf’s team during rainy weather. Students asked Anthony to leave the area before the encounter turned physical.
Metcalf was stabbed once in the chest. Emergency responders took him to a hospital, where he died. Anthony was arrested and later charged with murder.
Jury convicts Anthony of murder.
Jurors convicted Anthony after hearing testimony about the confrontation, the knife, and statements made after the stabbing. Anthony did not testify in his own defense.
The jury sentenced him to 35 years in prison after finding him guilty. ABC News reported the jury’s sentence after deliberations in the punishment phase.
Prosecutors argued the evidence showed murder, not self-defense. The defense said Anthony believed he was in danger and acted to protect himself.
Appeal filed after sentencing
Anthony’s legal team has moved to challenge the conviction. Court records show he filed a notice of appeal on Wednesday, one day after the jury sentenced him.
The filing asked for an appointed appellate attorney and stated that Anthony could not afford counsel for the appeal. The appeal does not erase the conviction or sentence.
An appellate court will review legal issues from the trial. It will not automatically retry the case or rehear all witness testimony.
Jury makeup drew objections.
The case also drew attention because no Black jurors were seated for Anthony’s trial. Anthony is Black, while Metcalf is white.
Twelve jurors and six alternates were selected before testimony began. CBS Texas reported all Black jurors were dismissed during jury selection, prompting objections from the defense and criticism from supporters.
Smith said he was troubled by the jury makeup. Still, he said his concern about the panel did not change his view of Anthony’s actions in the stabbing.
The trial focused on the seconds before stabbing.
The trial centered on the short confrontation under the team tent. Jurors heard from students and adults who described the dispute before Metcalf was stabbed.
A key question was whether Anthony reasonably believed he faced an immediate threat. Prosecutors said the knife transformed the encounter into a murder.
The defense argued the confrontation escalated quickly and that Anthony acted out of fear. Jurors rejected that argument when they returned the guilty verdict.
The case stirred a national dispute.
The killing drew public attention almost immediately after the April 2025 track meet. Online arguments often focused on race, school safety, and whether Anthony’s actions fit Texas’s self-defense law.
Local and national coverage followed the case through bond hearings, jury selection, trial testimony, and sentencing. NBC DFW later reviewed what trial testimony revealed about the events leading to the stabbing.
Officials also dealt with misinformation after the killing. Frisco police and federal authorities investigated false claims and fake documents tied to the case.
The Metcalf family addressed the court.
Members of Metcalf’s family spoke during the sentencing phase. They described the loss of Austin and the effect of his death on their family.
Metcalf’s twin brother, Hunter, was present at the track meet and later testified. The case has repeatedly returned to the fact that the brothers were together when the fatal confrontation began.
The family has said it wanted accountability for Austin’s death. The 35-year sentence marked the court’s punishment, but it did not end the legal process.
Anthony remains in custody.
Anthony remains convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison while the appeal begins. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice has released an updated image of him after sentencing.
The appellate process will determine whether any legal errors affected the trial or sentence. No appellate ruling has been issued.
For now, the latest development is Smith’s forceful public response to a case already decided by a jury but still moving through the courts. Anthony’s conviction stands, the appeal is pending, and the Metcalf family continues to live with the loss of Austin more than a year after the Frisco track meet stabbing.