The package is familiar. The price feels reasonable. You have bought it before, so into the cart it goes.
That is a perfectly understandable way to shop. It is also why comparative taste tests can be revealing: remove the label, and the product has to stand on what is actually on the plate.
Store brands have won documented comparisons against national brands. But a responsible account needs more than a list of supermarket names. It needs the exact product, the test date, and a clear explanation of what won.
A recent bacon comparison provides one example. Older Consumer Reports results offer others, but read them as historical findings, not a shopping list verified for today.
A documented 2026 winner
America’s Test Kitchen named Trader Joe’s Uncured Dry Rubbed Sliced Bacon its best regular bacon in a review published Aug. 19, 2026.
The testing team evaluated eight regular bacons and six thick-cut products. The team randomized samples and assigned three-digit codes to limit brand bias, then tasted the bacon after preparing it using the organization’s oven-fried method.
The regular-bacon lineup included products from Smithfield, Sugar Land, Oscar Mayer, Jimmy Dean, Whole Foods Market, Bar-S, Hormel, and Trader Joe’s. America’s Test Kitchen’s published comparison identifies the products and describes the testing.
The panel favored the Trader Joe’s product for its balance of smoky, salty, and sweet flavors and its chewy texture. Those are the testers’ findings, not a claim that every household will prefer the same bacon.
The result is also product-specific. It applies to Trader Joe’s Uncured Dry Rubbed Sliced Bacon, not every bacon carrying the retailer’s name.
That precision matters. In the same review, the organization chose Wright Hickory Real Wood Smoked Thick-Cut Bacon as its thick-cut winner. The store brand won one category; a national brand won the other.
What earlier comparisons found
Consumer Reports published a separate set of findings in September 2010. Across 21 head-to-head comparisons, store brands won three times, national brands won seven times, and eleven matchups ended in ties. Consumer Reports’ original announcement records the results.
Those numbers do not show that one type of brand always wins. They show that a recognizable label did not guarantee the preferred product in every comparison.
Two examples remain useful illustrations of that point:
Food Lion Lotsa’ Noodles soup: Consumer Reports’ trained testers preferred it to Campbell’s Chicken Noodle in the 2010 comparison, citing somewhat more intense flavor.
Publix Premium orange juice: The store-brand juice ranked ahead of Tropicana in that same set of tests, with testers noting less cooked flavor and slightly less bitterness. Consumer Reports
The Oklahoman also reported those findings in September 2010, identifying the same soup and orange-juice comparisons.
These are historical results. They do not establish that the products retain the same formulas, availability, or relative ranking in 2026. A current shopper should not treat a sixteen-year-old result as proof that today’s package is superior.
Related: Never Buy These 8 Foods Again, They’re Cheaper to Make at Home
A tie is not a disappointing result
A comparison does not need a dramatic winner to be useful.
Consumer Reports explained that products could be similarly fresh and flavorful while tasting different because their recipes or seasonings differed. In its 2010 results, several store-brand and national-brand pairs tied rather than producing a clear preference.
For someone shopping for dinner, that distinction is practical. You may prefer one ketchup on a burger and another in a sauce. Peanut butter that tastes good on toast may not make your favorite cookies.
“Comparable quality” does not mean “identical flavor.” Nor does a test winner guarantee the best result in every recipe.
The larger question is what you expect the ingredient to do. Bacon for a BLT, broth for a pan sauce, and juice served by the glass each involve different uses and preferences.
Read the result before the recommendation
When you encounter a claim that a store brand beat a national brand, look for four details: the exact product, the competing products, the test date, and the method.
For the 2026 bacon comparison, those details are available. For the 2010 soup and juice results, the findings are documented, but their age limits what they can tell a shopper now.
Also distinguish a winner from a recommended product. A product can receive favorable comments without ranking first. Turning a recommendation into a victory changes what the evidence means.
Price requires its own comparison. The historical Consumer Reports announcement included prices and savings calculations from 2010. Those figures should not be presented as current checkout costs. Likewise, a taste result alone cannot tell you which package represents better value at your local store today.
The takeaway is neither “always buy the store brand” nor “the national brand is worth the premium.” Preference should remain open to evidence.
A supermarket label can win a carefully conducted test. A national brand can win the next category. And your own cooking may give you a reason to choose differently from either panel.
Try a specific product rather than buying into a blanket rule. Prepare it the way you normally would, notice what works, and keep the result in perspective. If a familiar name disappeared from the package, what would your taste buds tell you to buy again?
